I
was reading a book on the life and times of Sai
Baba of Shirdi. There is a section
in the book that talks about how he used to cook food himself and serve it to
his devotees. The food distributed by him varied from vegetarian food like “Sheera” ( rava kesari) “Ambil”
(simple millet porridge) to Mutton
Biryani. Both vegetarian and non vegetarian dishes were cooked and distributed side by side .
People ate what they were used to!! There was no system of segregation- food
and eating together in this case being what united all his devotees!!! This was in 18th century India in a village in Maharashtra. Though a
lot of people who were close to Baba were Brahmins never did anyone question
about non vegetarian food being cooked and served in the same premises!!
But
today I find a certain degree of intolerance creeping in with regard to food. I was told that the management of a popular
English daily based out of Chennai had recently issued a circular saying that
employees could not bring non vegetarian items in their lunch box!! It was a
bit shocking to hear about this because
the newspaper holds a very balanced view in terms of issues that it reports and
writes about!
While
it may be something new where this newspaper is concerned, it not uncommon
among many of the so called “popular” schools in Chennai where the rules do not
permit the students to bring any non vegetarian food!! We do
not hear of such instances of “banning food groups” in schools in the rest of
the country. I grew up in Calcutta and ate my curd rice quite happily sitting
together with groups of friends who brought fish curry and rice or chicken
sandwiches. As a vegetarian I did not of course share their food but I had no
objections to eating with them or
sharing my lunch with them. The school management though very strict about
every other aspect never really interfered with this. People tell me that was
because it was a “convent school” ( “Christians are non veg aren’t they?” ) . I
don’t think friends in my colony going to schools run by Hindu establishments,
Kendriya Vidyalayas etc faced any such restrictions either !! Thankfully my
daughter’s school, despite being in Chennai does not have these restrictions!
The only instruction that was given to us when she joined school was to pack
lunch that “the child is used to eating and is able to eat by himself/ herself”
What
surprises me most about these food restrictions is the manner in which people
accept them meekly. Whether it is an office or school management or a landlord
who enforces it, no one actually questions it as something that infringes on
our rights as a citizen. People just
accept enforced vegetarianism thinking it to be “superior”!!!!
My
husband is probably the only person I know who has raised this issue at his
work place. He works for a diplomatic mission in Chennai. Though there is no
official rule here about food, the Indian employees tried to segregate tables
as “vegetarian” and “non vegetarian”!! While in a social function it might be alright considering it helps in
the serving of food by the hosts, in the office dining hall, he found it smacking of casteism. He had to bring it to the notice of
the Head of the Mission and relate it to him using international parallels like
the 1950s segregation in the US for them to understand. Needless to say, hubby is one of the most unpopular members among the
Indian staff there today!! He undergoes
what he humorously terms as “social boycott” during lunch time by a large
majority of people from a certain community. His only lunch companions being
foreigners or Indian staff who work as drivers and gardeners. But he is not
complaining !!!
You
might wonder if my “tolerance” to non vegetarian food emerged out of my
Calcutta days or post marriage to a Christian. I would say it is neither. I
have just been taught to accept it as a food preference by a person or persons
or a community. My parents have never tried to inculcate in me a sense of my superiority
of being a vegetarian person. They have always told me to accept what people
eat as it is their culture. And I think
my parents were progressive because these ideas were dinned into me decades ago
before it was “fashionable” to hold such “liberal” views.
While I do attempt cooking non vegetarian
food, I think I do not do justice to these dishes. So non vegetarian food is
often bought from outside. But we eat at the same table because we believe that a family that eats
together stays together. When we accept people with
their culture we accept them totally. Food, as we know is an essential part of
culture!! It is unfortunate that educational institutions are enforcing food
restrictions that smacks of cultural chauvinism! The canteen in an institution or a restaurant are
well within their rights to serve a certain type of food. But no institution has
the business to tell anyone what they should bring as packed food to school or to office!!
Food
can be used to promote inclusion or indicate exclusion!! It is the ultimate
equalizer! It is probably the reason why
Islam preaches that people should eat together out of a single plate. It is
also why Sai Baba cooked and served
food to his devotees and ate along with them. Though I have many reservations
about the way his philosophy has been taken over and “sanskritized” over the years, one of the few things that still
impress me about the Sai temples is
the way Prasad is served. Everyone
stands in a queue and receives the same plate of food- whether it is a lady dressed in silk and diamonds or the
beggar outside the temple!!
But
what leaves me very disturbed is the way we are training our kids to develop
ideas about people’s food habits. Is it any surprise that our society continues
to remain fragmented despite the efforts of religious and social reformers over
the years?
( Requesting visitors to this blog to please leave behind a comment indicating your views)
Very topical. There is a person I know (and you know too) who is practicing a form of vegetarianism where they will not eat in what they call 'multi cuisine restaurants or 'mixed kitchens'. If we want to eat out with this person, we are severely restricted in our options. The person carries it so far as to not eat on trains due to said 'mixed kitchens' and carries cooked food from home. They will not eat at social functions held in multi cuisine eateries. And the worst part is, this behaviour is feted as a virtue!! As a host, if someone did that to me, I would be severely offended. I think this behaviour is casteist and elitist and should be condemned.
ReplyDeleteI am writing this from a hotel near the University in Calgary. Just moments before I logged onto this article, I went to the breakfast room to get a hot cup of coffee before settling into my computer. I was overwhelmed with the aromas of fried bacon and pork sausage in the dining area. When I looked up, I noticed that the room was near filled with Moslem guests, not seeming to be offended by the food in the room. It made me wonder about Canada and how well everyone appears to co-mingle and live together.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I've had some disagreements and falling out with friends over food issues. In the 70's, I became vegetarian for health reasons. I remained vegetarian until 2002, when a health issue forced me to return to eating the flesh of fresh water white fish and lamb. Some of my friends now post scare-tactic type of animal cruelty related messages on my facebook wall. Others stopped talking to me.
In my home, I host beautiful dinner parties. I keep everything vegan, except for a very specific portion of meat or fish, which can be separated from all vegan side dishes and deserts. Guests still complain or refuse to attend if there might be salmon or lamb on the table.
The best I can think about it is Caucasian privilege. Yes, I'm a caucasian U.S. American woman. But I am filled with amazement and amusement that comes from other women around me who are snobs and snoopes about what people eat. In my peer group, food and food beliefs are not the great equalizer, but an enormous divider.
i wonder what will i do if my office put that notice, it seems i only eat non veg ..
ReplyDeletethe problem is that in todays world everyone has something to say on everything especially if that is to do with someone else ..
it doesnot bother me who eats what and how .. everyone has their own choice .. I eat anything and everything :)
Bikram
@ Kameshwari the issue in India regarding veg/ non veg food is a little more complex. I guess I should have explained that more clearly in the blog. Veg food was usually eaten by the highest of castes and considered "pure" while non veg "impure" in comparison. Here the purity issue went beyond food - it was a caste issue that manifested itself in the form of food. Among non veg food there is flesh that is considered most "polluting" - that of a pig or cow usually eaten by the lowest of castes or the "untouchables". So when we talk about culture chauvinism here we mean that people traditionally used to eating a certain type of food were forced to eat something which was considered a "purer" form of food!!! But I am surprised that people in Canada equate flesh eaters with animal cruelty!
ReplyDelete@ Deepa I can understand your feelings. What is being expressed is not a food preference but a form of exclusion!
@ Bikram I wish people were more like you!!
“What is your food is another man’s poison.” If we can accept this simple difference in each of us well what is the difficulty if the person sitting next to you is having cold pork meat or potatoes?
ReplyDeleteI guess I agree with your husband’s righteous incense. I would have done the same too.
Coincidentally, I had lunch today at a very close friend’s home. He is married to an Iyengar Brahmin lady and she as well as their two girls is veg. But while we were having lunch she served us (me and her husband) dark spicy fish curry sent by his mother who lives a few blocks away.
The attitude at your husband’s office is hideous and smacks of prejudice and shameful casteism.
Intolerance, that is the scourge the epidemic today , not Ebola and not HIV.
Sigh yes Meera that's the scene here - in Madras/Chennai. And as you well know, totally absent in Calcutta where the 'highest, lowest and all in between' eat nonveg, where food is intrinsic to the culture.
ReplyDeleteThe school I work in does not have an official rule stating that non-vegetarian isn't allowed but it is expected of teachers to carry only veg meals - the canteen is pure veg, sometimes also having only Jain food....and if teachers have non-veg in their lunch-boxes, they are expected to not sit with the vegetarians....
ReplyDeleteBeing from Kolkata myself, I find this rather strange - I am a non-vegetarian but in my school-days, just like you, I had vegetarian friends who sat next to me while we ate our tiffins....Even children, these days, I find are becoming intolerant towards food preferences at a very young age.....A boy in class V complained to the teacher that a boy from 1st standard brought chicken in his lunch-box and he touched him without washing his hands - hence he is polluted and dirty!!! I was amazed to see such attitudes from such a small boy....we need to promote a culture where food is acceptable and preferences aren't hierarchic....
@ Leela and Divya I wonder if tolerance is a uniquely Kolkata thing? But I don't think so. I think a lot of places in India must be tolerant. At least it used to be when we were growing up. Today's kids are very narrow minded. I wonder how this happened.....
ReplyDelete@ Anil, yes indeed one man's food is another's poison. But food is still food and living together means accommodating that!! But we Indians like to make an issue of everything it appears...!!
ReplyDelete