So
Janmasthami is over! All of us have
celebrated the birthday of the “naughtiest” and the “notorious” Lord Krishna.
The butter thief and the flirt! A darling of women, both as a child and when he
was older! Though he is also the
originator and orator of the “Bhagvad Geeta” which expounds the wonderful philosophy around life, few of
us actually think of him in that role! For most of us the image that comes to
our mind when we think of him is a dark cherubic infant polishing off a pot of
butter or the young man playing the flute on the banks of the Yamuna! Poets
like Surdas and Meerabai wrote about him building and embellishing those images
and finally that is what sticks to the average human mind!
But
this post is not so much about Shri Krishna but the qualities of mischief and notoriety
that mark his childhood and teens.
I
remember when I was in primary school there
was this fellow who never did his
homework and was always pulled up by the
teacher . He managed to contort his face in the most amazing way from his
position outside the class which was generally where he was relegated to ! All the other boys seemed very “tame” in
comparison! I used to be full of tales of this boy whenever I got home. While
my mother does not remember many of my friends from primary school his name has
certainly stuck in her mind. She pulls
it out every now and then and wonders what became of him. She can even recall
his mother’s name and face - a harassed
looking lady who used to go home with a red face after listening to the
complaints about her son!
Unfortunately,
I had to move to an all girls school later. Interestingly the “bad girls” did
not seem so interesting! Ofcourse, one used to be agog listening to their
exploits on the grapevine but that was it!! They did not acquire the aura of
heroism that the “bad boys” had!
College
was again co educational. Being a professional college there used to be strict
segregation between the sexes. However some of the boys managed to break that
invisible barrier!! And yes, they were
the “bad boys”! I was paired with a couple of them during practical classes. Though it was supposedly three of us who were
the “practical batch”, it was as though I was working alone because both of
them would never show up!! They were confident that they could copy the reading
off me or if I was feeling more benign borrow my record and copy the entire
experiment! It used to be annoying but they had their uses. They used to chat
up the lab assistants before the practical exams and find out what were the
salts being given for analysis. I, being their favored friend would be provided
the information just before I walked into the lab for the exam. People used to
be amazed how these fellows managed to score such high marks despite bunking most
of the practical classes.
Even
the women professors were not immune to their charms. When one of them broke a
retort during a practical class (this was on one of those few occasions when
they managed to grace the lab with their presence) he managed to “talk” his way
out of paying for it!! Chivalrous chap that he was, he employed the same
technique once again in the final semester when I broke a burette! And that was
how I managed to get my provisional degree without losing any of my caution
deposit!
I
wonder what is it about these fellows that
makes them attractive? I guess it
is something about their being non conformists and original that is the point! Women, having
been brought up in a society where they are expected to behave in a certain
way are secretly tiered of conformity!!
Otherwise why would Scarlett O” Hara be fascinated by Rhett Butler? But one
must admit that they come with a lot of charm which makes them get away with “murder”
and the best thing is that they know how to manipulate a girl or woman in a way
that makes them putty in their hands ( remember Shri Krishna asking Yashoda how
could he have stolen the butter because
he could not reach it where it was hung and his hands were anyway so small)
But
what about “bad girls”? For starters, they
are certainly not liked by their own sex. Firstly, their overt expression of non
conformist behavior (often an exaggerated projection of sexuality) makes them
very unpopular with their own sex. Many boys are also scared of them for the
same reasons. They feel a threat to their masculinity in the presence of these
girls / women. The interesting part of being a “bad girl” is that charm is not
a part of the adjective that describes
you! These girls/ women also know how to manipulate but they are often called “B___HES”
because they do so.
I
suppose bad girls do hold a fascination for the opposite sex the same way that
bad boys do!! But what happens to relationships with the a “bad person” ? Is the attraction a fatal one? After all
playing with “fire” is not without its consequences? One is bound to get hurt.
I
have had so many women friends who have walked into such relationships with “bad
boys” with their “eyes wide open” so to
say and found themselves miserable. I think the problem is that we women think
we can change these fellows! And where “bad girls” are concerned, they
themselves die a slow agonizing death as somewhere along the way they get badly
hurt by all those who decide to take advantage of them. Unfortunately being a “bad
girl” means you cannot allow yourself to exhibit these feelings of
vulnerability – you are fighting a gender stereotype as you try to sustain the negative image. Both your feelings and your
reputation gets hurt.
While
people can forgive a bad boy by saying “Well boys will be boys” one can rarely
say that about girls! We girls and women carry a lot of burden on our backs- it
is called social responsibility. One bad behavior on our part and our entire
tribe can get branded!
I
remember a muslim classmate from school who had a boy friend. She used to often
miss school to go out with him. When it was found out by the principal all hell
broke loose!! Her parents were called
and she was suspended from school with threats of expulsion! I sometimes think
now about how it must have affected the prospects of education of other girls
in her community.. She came from a fairly conservative background and in those
circles it must have been interpreted that education gives girls too much “freedom”
and they go “astray”!
Being
“bad” might just be a passing phase in some people’s life! People grow up and
start acting more responsibly Even Shri Krishna quit chasing the Gopis and
started focusing on politics and diplomacy! As a bad boy, the qualities of charm might aid
you in whatever you do and whenever you do them and being a bad girl might just
give you the hard headed ambition that could make you focus on your career! After
all. no image is devoid of its opportunities!
Just
because someone calls you “bad” you do not become bad! It is the way society
interprets human behavior and slots them into categories. The gender classification
is unfortunately not fair across the same category! No wonder we do not have a
female equivalent of Shri Krishna!
a very clear analysis.. Loved reading it as usual.. And yes bad girls have it tough.. same old gender bias..
ReplyDeleteWere you in my college? You have described me accurately. I was also arrogant. When someone introduced a very very beautiful girl to me, I asked her what is her major. She said English Literature. I said you are wasting your time. She was shocked. She only knew boys who come after her with "jollu". Since I did not do that, she fell in love with me. We both got married and living happily ever after.
ReplyDeleteHmm a female equivalent of Krishna? Are we- the society enlightened and less non conforming to accept such a rebellion?
ReplyDeleteI think, if girls are less recalcitrant and problematic in their teens must be because of the social conditioning, and outlook society has. Though that may be fast changing in the face of education and boldness that come with it.
But male dominant mindset has made it so that a naughty girl is a pariah for life than a lecherous teenage boy.
Infractions are bound to be there both among boys and girls when they pass through the upheaval times of teenage.
As for Krishna it has not been alleged that he was immoral. It was only the playful banter that he meted out on the hapless women folk in his tribe that was adapted into poetic and other art forms. He, we can see was a dutiful husband of two women and the other uncharitable attributes alleged to him are innuendo.
However the mythical characters always have a haze screen about them. It enhances to the myth.
Well said, Meera. I was a tom-boy back in school, so had a fair share of my Krishna type boy friends;) But the ****hes type girls- nah..instant dislike for them :P Good analysis, this!
ReplyDelete@SG interesting to hear about your college romance and its happy ending!! But I would not say that these "bad boys" were all "arrongant"- actually most of them were quite charming -hence the attraction!!! :)
ReplyDelete@ Anil glad you see my point around women's "Krishna type behavior" - but I am not suggesting Krishna was immoral!! He was quite a charmer and open in his exhibition of love! No wonder he is such a favorite charchter in mythology!
@ Cloud Nine, Yes being a tom boy helps!! These Krishna types don't try their stunts on you because you are mistaken to be one of them :)
ReplyDelete@ Simple girl thanks so much for your comment!!!
As usual, superb post and on a subject, not many would actually write. I thank you for the post, it gave a wonderful reading.
ReplyDeleteYes we do not have a female equivalent to Sri Krishna and I am sure, she would not have been so celebrated and venerated.
I myself love Scarlett-O-Hara, who was a non-conformist and a SURVIVOR. And not many of her survival strategies were 'JUST" in the conventional way.
I think boys would love to have the BAD GIRLS as friends. Remember in Sathiya Vivak Oberoi has the Topi-wearing tom boy who smokes and he refers to her as 'Bhai lagti hai.' But certainly they are NOT the ones he would like to introduce to his parents as her beloved and desired life partner.
I loved reading your post and looking forward to one about BAD GIRLS..
Very interesting. I think that today's guys and girls have different defintions of being bad and compared to them, the "bads" of even 2 decades ago, seem tame. :)
ReplyDelete