I
know Indian politics is akin to a dirty toilet but folks this post is not about that!
I
have been meaning to write about this theme for a while. The
idea came to me last week when I was attending a seminar at a reputed
agriculture university in southern India. A woman co participant came up to me
and asked if I knew where the ladies toilet was.
I pointed her towards a corridor
which had the signboard “Toilets” written on the wall. She went there and returned almost immediately. Even
before she could say why she was back, I guessed the reason. The door was locked!!! This is a practice with most government
institutions
I
discovered this quite early on in life
when I joined my bachelor’s degree at an agriculture university in another
southern state. We used to have one smelly room adjoining what used to be
called “Ladies room” which about 300 female under grad students had to use to
relieve themselves ! The various departments of course had their own Ladies toilets
but they were all locked with privileged entry status only for women PG
students and professors from the
concerned department! If you were a visitor
and female, you would have to pray that you were near an area where there were
enough bushes ..!!
I
also encountered in the same agriculture university where I was last week
another interesting facility “VVIP
toilet” !!!! I mean, why? Do very important people excrete gold?
While
lack of adequate public toilets for women in this country is a big problem,
there is an even bigger problem that exists in terms of general access and use
of toilets . In a hierarchy conscious society
like ours toilets are, rarely viewed as public conveniences. They are more like
private privileges allotted to you because of your position in society by birth
or some other status.
Those
of you who have watched the movie called “ Help” would recall the scene where
white American women in the Southern States led a campaign that they called “Separate
but equal” – protesting against allowing their domestic help of African origin
from using toilets inside their homes. Now, this is something that is very
common in Indian households. Even in our own home, my mother in law had a
specially designated toilet allocated for them. This toilet is outside the
house and very inconvenient to use when it rains. We (MIL and I) have had innumerable arguments over allowing
them to use our toilets at least during days when it was raining. Sometimes the
light in this toilet used to fuse and my mother in law did not want to spend
money on replacing the bulb . Her logic was ‘At least we are providing them
with a toilet. Look at the neighbors, they don’t have a toilet for their
servants” ..Anyway, I won the argument many years down the line when she was
bedridden and needed a full time care giver. That was when her caregivers,
domestics and herself all began to use the same toilets . Now, after her time we have done away with
this distinction. Everyone who visits the house or lives in it uses the toilets
that the house provides. The rule is that “Use any toilet but keep it clean”.
I
wonder why entry barriers to toilet access exist in our country. Many schools
have separate toilets for teachers and students ( though my daughter’s school
doesn’t). Offices have separate toilets for “officers”/ “Managers” and “staff”!!!
People justify it on the grounds that people from “certain classes of society” do not know how to maintain and use toilets
and hence the need for segregation! But I would say why not use this
opportunity to teach them how to? It would serve a public cause in a country
like ours where invariably all toilets (public and private) are generally
unclean!!!
But
in this quest for equality should men and women use
the same toilets? The reason why I think men and women need separate toilets is
because toilets are places for fulfillment of biological needs. Men and women
being built differently use toilets differently and hence the need for gender segregated
toilets! Besides, women in most cultures
are rather embarrassed of being seen in the same space as men while attending
to this need! And one must remember that
toilets are not just places where you relieve yourself. You also use the space
for adjusting your clothes, combing your hair – imagine how embarrassing it
might be for a woman to have a man walk in while she is adjusting her
clothes..!!! Even if it is a single cubicle “gender neutral” toilet in an
office it would be equally embarrassing
for a man to open the toilet cabinet and chance upon a packet of woman’s
sanitary napkins. Men find it as disgusting to use a blood stained toilet bowl as
women who complain of men peeing without putting down the toilet seat ( not to
say either of these conditions are permissible even in a single sex toilet).
Anyway,
coming back to the question of privileged access to such public conveniences, I would like to share an incident concerning
such toilet use in a reputed non profit organization in my city . This
organization initially did not have separate toilets for men and women. But
when the women demanded a separate toilet the men agreed grudgingly! There were
more men in this office than women, so they built another toilet in the back
yard for use by drivers and support staff . But the Regional Director of this
organization that was supposedly working for equality continued to have his privileged
individual use of the attached toilet ( which incidentally had two doors but
the other door leading to the room next door was permanently shut so that it
would remain his private toilet). The women on the other hand did not have such
distinctions. All the women( Managers,
officers, clerks, receptionist and support staff) used the women’s toilet quite
happily. So who was perpetuating social
discrimination – the men, the women or the leader of the office? Of course if
you ask the men they would tell you that it was women who began the entire
discrimination issue by demanding a separate toilet for themselves!!
Eating
and defecating are some universal human needs but we seem to use these very
same needs to further our class/ caste divides. I think it is pointless talking
about ending socio economic hierarchies unless we are ready to rid ourselves of
some deeply of these deeply entrenched biases!
Discrimination and prejudices apart, the absence or lack of civic sense irrespective of the social standing is the bane. Perfect examples are the public wash rooms. A lavatory or toilet is not considered as a place that must be accounted for as much as one does ones bedroom or living room.
ReplyDeleteNow the point you mentioned about the social discrimination is valid. I do not understand why the bias is not jettisoned. The argument about socially and economically backward people (domestic help, perhaps) being not used to cleanliness may be true.
However the age old social prejudice is also more than responsible for such attitude.
There are more number of mobiles than toilets in our country.
ReplyDeleteYou have brought out the ordeal that working women pass through in lack of adequate rest room facility.No license should be given to offices and business establishments that do not have adequate and separate restrooms for men and women in proportion to the number of employees.
ReplyDeleteThe issue of lack of toilet facilities in slums and hutments along with water and the ordeal the womenfolk pass through is never in the radar of corporation or gievrnemnt.The reluctance of apartment owners who themselves have one or two toilets to permit the use of toilets by domestic helps accentuates the problems.It is only the wearer who knows where the shoe pinches.For the very poor paid toilet facility is not affordable.
It is good that you have highlighted the issue in your writings.
This has been my pet peeve for a long time. India has no adequate toilet facilities either in offices or in public. Recently visited Chennai. If we get out of the house and until we come back, we have to hold. At least, men can manage. How about the ladies? Except of course the malls. Even there, the day we visited Express Avenue Mall, all the toilets had “out of order” sign.
ReplyDeleteAs in USA, there must be a law that all the petrol pumps should have neatly maintained men and women toilets and accessible to all men and women.
India will never become a “world power” unless there are enough toilet facilities for all men and women. The chances are slim because the guy who upgraded his toilet at a cost of Rs.35 lakhs fixes Rs.32 per day limit for poverty line.
@ Anil your observation about our lack of interest in keeping the toilet as clean as the living room tells us that it is wrong to blame people like domestic help as those who mess up toilets because toilets are anyway not kept clean even by most so called educated and upper class people.
ReplyDelete@ SG the issue is not just about lack of toilets ( thought that in itself is also an issue) but about the entry /access barriers to the common people just because some so called powerful or privileged person cordons off the toilet for his/ her personal use!!!
@ KP thanks for understanding the ordeals of working women. Glad you agree about the need for men and women's toilets. Yes, it is very unfair when people with 2-3 toilets do not permit their domestic help to use toilets in their homes.
ReplyDelete@ Kalpana, it is interesting what you say about number of toilets to cell phones. But again the issue is not just about the number of toilets available but access to those.