( This post is part of Blog Adda's campaign on men who are "Soldiers for women:)
I
have worked for nearly two decades with the non profit or the NGO sector. I like to call this the “change” business! Like any business, this sector also markets commodities
in the form of issues in which change is required. There are socially conscious people like you
, me, governments, corporates, who are all investors in this business of
change.
The
NGO sector, for the uninformed, is not exactly something that runs on the
strength of volunteers or service oriented persons. There are highly professional people with
specialized qualifications who are part of it. And the process of bringing about change is
not simple- it is about as complicated as manufacturing cars from sheets of
steel, assembling silicon chips to make an electronic product or mixing chemicals to make drugs. The larger the
NGO, more the funding that comes in and therefore more complicated it is to run
it. Whatever be the size, the vision
for all NGOs is the same - to bring
about change in a certain condition – it could be a situation of water shortage
in a village ,income levels of people,
ability to cope with a disability etc.
There
are people who think that working in a NGO is a very noble profession! I will not dispute that but I would like to
clarify that for many people in the sector, it is a job like any other. For
every five out of ten persons who are part of the sector, it involves
delivering on targets,( yes people here also have targets), following
instructions, abiding by rules and
hoping that they get their increments, promotions and move up in the hierarchy or moving out into another
non profit for a better salary! Nothing
wrong with that.. these are people who are making an honest living in a sector
that most people do not opt for ! Everyone has a family to support and personal
aspirations to fulfill.
What role does leadership play in this sector? I would say that leadership here
carries more responsibility than in any other sector because not only does it call for trusteeship in
terms of holding and spending other people’s money for a cause ,it also
involves bringing together heads and hearts
among your team mates so that everyone believes and works for that
positive change! But sometimes, these changes can be very challenging because
they question age old belief systems – beliefs that are so deeply ingrained in
the society we want to change and in ourselves who are also part of this
society.
It
is in this context that the story of my soldier is set. His war was against a society that made
women – particularly poor women, powerless . An extremely quiet and reflective
individual, he is the antithesis of the image of a firebrand feminist who is generally associated with such things.
Rather silly perceptions, really.. and anyway whoever said that a feminist was only
female?
I
met him for the first time in 2006 and my first impression was “I am not
impressed” So I stood back and watched how he would deal
with the mess that we were in at that time!
But deal with the situation he did
… and how!!!!
There
was a belief that prevailed at that time
among our project team, that we were helping women if we were able to
provide them with physical items – as in “things” . For example, if a
fisherwoman was given a fish basket we felt good about it thinking that we
have changed her life! As a person, who was involved in measuring change within
the project, most people thought I was a very complicated person when I said
that giving baskets to women would not really change their lives. Their idea
was that more the number of such baskets given more one could say that women
had been helped. I learnt to keep my frustration with the situation to myself
and go about counting the number of women and reporting on that.
Frustrations
however, have a way of expressing themselves-sometimes as vocal outbursts and
sometimes in other ways. A perceptive person, this soldier quickly understood
that something was bothering me. I spent about an hour one day, trying to
explain the situation. I was not sure that he would understand it because, I
was new to the organization at that time and I thought probably I was the one
with the problem . But he did understand as was evident from the questions he
started posing during the team meetings and reviews. And I must say he started creating opportunities to help me use research effectively to see if such change was really happening! I was given a lot of freedom in terms of how I wanted to go about it but the bottom line was that I was accountable in terms of clearly bringing to the notice of the operations team what was going right in terms of change and what was not. And every finding had to be supported with data!
When
we work in the change business there is usually just a thin line that separates
the personal from the professional. This is particularly so if we are trying to
change the lives of women. When we do this, we question social hierarchies and
also address abuse of power. Sometimes it is not enough to just go there and
make that change ourselves. We have to enable the woman, who perceives herself
as powerless to make that change – it gives her a huge feeling of confidence, a
confidence that stays on with her for the rest of her life multiplying itself
over the years.
I
can state a personal example about how I was made to experience this. An
extremely senior man in the organization suddenly took a dislike to me tearing
apart a strategy paper I had worked very
hard on. I was very shocked by his response and I suspected that his criticism
was not objective. To say I was humiliated would be an
understatement! I was in tears and was ready to quit.
I
explained the matter to the soldier- my boss.
I wanted him to "take it up" with this person . But he reacted very differently. He made me write a long mail to this person, challenging
the points on which the paper was rubbished! I was sure that this mail was
probably the last one that I was sending from that id. But strangely, it wasn’t
.. I received an acknowledgement to the mail and also an acceptance that may be
there was a point in what I was saying. There was a strange feeling within me then- a
mixture of confidence , faith in myself and elation that I had managed to do
this! It was much later that I realized why my solider had not taken up arms.
He had wanted me to experience this – it helped tremendously in building faith
in myself. Such people are called “enablers” . They lead from behind, giving
their troops the confidence to win the battle.
This
was a strategy that we began to follow in all our work with women. Under his
leadership, we began to look at ourselves as enablers. He demonstrated to us
through his words and actions that for a change to sustain, the women whose
lives we are setting out to change must develop the confidence and trigger it.
It might take time but it was well worth the wait!
We started approaching issues very differently. Every action that we planned
had to be well thought through before we took it to him. Though he encouraged us to be creative in our
ideas, he was quick to spot wild ones. He told us the risk of putting on the
ground some ideas that we thought were “revolutionary” in terms of their
ability to bring about change. He cautioned us about the repercussions it could
have on the lives of poor women should they fall through. Every idea therefore
had to come from the women themselves and had to be thoroughly discussed with them before we
approved through our funding!
Like
a good soldier, he was quick to spot the ones in his team who were fired with
genuine passion . He placed passion at a
premium investing his time and efforts in molding people who had enough of it! Like a true general he was able to
differentiate between the “mercenaries” and the “patriots”. He dealt with them
differently!
The
non profit sector like any other, thrives on myths . There is a belief that
only women can lead organizations or projects that deal with empowering women.
Some people even believe that only women can work with women. But I think such
beliefs absolve men from taking on the responsibility of addressing issues
around women’s lives. Empathy is gender
neutral. Any sensitive person can understand the pain of another. The lives of poor women in this country is an
example of pain borne bravely on thin shoulders. So, why does the burden of
having to lighten it be thrust only on women? And about being a soldier- it is not only a man who can be a soldier. All of us can be and are potential soldiers.
One
does not necessarily need an organizational platform to be that soldier. But it is a pity if one is sitting on that platform and not helping another with
conviction. A person who believes with passion that change , however difficult is
possible is a hero/ heroine . Such people take others along with them infusing positive energy. A
coming together of such energy is what causes social change- it is what makes
that subtle difference between doing a job well for that increment at the end
of the year to bringing a smile on a poor woman's face.
My
soldier did not receive any awards but I know for a fact that if he were to visit
any of those villages where we worked, even after all these years women would
come out in droves to greet him. Now, isn’t that what true appreciation is all
about?
This post is a part of <a title="#Soldierforwomen" href="http://www.gillette.com/en-IN/" target="_blank">#Soldierforwomen</a> in association with <a title="The Best Community of Indian Bloggers" href="http://www.blogadda.com" target="_blank">BlogAdda.com</a>
Hi I am first time seeing your blog and I cannot stop myself from reading all your archives! It's just so much sensible here unlike the jibber jabber of others!
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you that counting the number of baskets you gave is absolutely bonkers to determine your success rate. Alas! our government understands it too.
And I don't mean to criticise your boss or anything but what all he actually did was just back your idea...so it's you who is the real winner here. But let's not get into any controversies here.
Loved your blog
Have a nice day :)
Very nicely written.The soldier or your boss as I could makke out believed first in empowering the women who were the change agents before they empowered the women for whom changes are sought to be made.he could distinguish between the workers who received their salaries and the workers who worked for a cause,salary being incidental.Above all he built self faith and confidence in the people who worked in NGO while making them answerable to the outcomes in terms of changes in attitude and confidence at the beneficiary end and not in terms of tangible things delivered.
ReplyDeleteYou have brought out with clarity the role of NGOs clearly and that there is equal scope for men to participate in this cause of empoweing women
Nice post. Love it.
ReplyDeleteThat senior executive is a nice person,I think. If he was tearing apart your strategy paper that does not mean he “dislikes” you or “hates” you. “Suddenly took a dislike to me”? I don’t think so.
Senior executives behave differently in different countries. Here, if I send a proposal to my Senior Vice President and if he/she does not like it, they don’t tear it apart. He/She will ask about 2 or 3 questions. You reply. More 2 or 3 questions. You reply. More 2 or 3 questions. Then you realize (or a soldier will tell you) to drop the proposal all together. Proposal is dead.
Sorry to say a corporation is not a democracy.
Iheard you- welcome to this blog and thanks a lot for your encouraging comments. You are right about my idea being backed. But the trick is to know which is the idea that can be backed and also to identity ideas that are backed by passion. I hope to see you more here.
ReplyDelete@ KP thanks for your comments. NGOs are like any other organization- there are those who like what they do and others and who do it because there is something in it for them.
@SG welcome back after a long break :). Actually, NGOs are not different from corportations. You are right to raise those questions. I wish I could tell you the "tale behind the tale" but it is beyond the scope of this post. The only cue for you is the line where I say that I suspect that his critcism was not entirely "objective" Every organization has its politics and it is not fair that I write about it publicly!
I was on vacation. Just came back. I very well understand what you are saying. Been there before.
ReplyDeleteM, you gave a pretty insight an impassioned one into a different world.
ReplyDeleteMay be it is that each of us is a carbon chunk waiting to be polished . And the man here did the same in a way .
From my experience I believe that leadership blossoms in an non offensive way and constructively when the pride and ego that are trappings of positions is absent. I have seen how egregious ego and haughtiness violates constructive atmosphere and possibilities.