tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post6243508494001897443..comments2023-06-28T20:33:55.060+05:30Comments on Chronicles of an Unknown Indian: “I DO” or “ I DID” ?Meera Sundararajanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15584671517551652378noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-23727919465998063042013-06-21T02:02:21.146+05:302013-06-21T02:02:21.146+05:30I am laughing hysterically with your choice of tit...I am laughing hysterically with your choice of title 'I do or I did' :D :D... I read that article and personally thought that the judge must have been high on something... how does one produce a 'documented proof' for having sex?? and what happens if a man has sex with more than 1 woman does that mean he will marry all of them??? SuKupedia ™ :) :)https://www.blogger.com/profile/09453745330932633801noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-14088103163448903032013-06-20T12:31:16.011+05:302013-06-20T12:31:16.011+05:30If the judgement notes that premarital sex is as e...If the judgement notes that premarital sex is as enforceable legally as a marriage , then it is madness. anilkurup59https://www.blogger.com/profile/07961961217418715354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-39685216858848114262013-06-19T12:44:19.002+05:302013-06-19T12:44:19.002+05:30@ Cloud Nine, you are right, courts need to be out...@ Cloud Nine, you are right, courts need to be outside people's bedrooms. And I don't think that live in relationships are just for the sex!<br /><br />@ Christopher, thanks for the link. Journalists need to do their homework and understand the judgement before writing up sensational headlines!Meera Sundararajanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15584671517551652378noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-32773168754151871032013-06-19T12:41:46.255+05:302013-06-19T12:41:46.255+05:30@ SG your questions are very valid but it is only ...@ SG your questions are very valid but it is only "His Honor" who can answer them :) - hopefully there will be revised judgement which will include all of this ( you can imagine the killing that lawyers will make when it comes to interpreting it !)<br /><br />@ Anil, glad you agree. Actually, I think the problem is also with the way it has been reported in the media. The judgement may not be be as crazy as the media guys say!Meera Sundararajanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15584671517551652378noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-55245128599650190362013-06-19T11:13:47.388+05:302013-06-19T11:13:47.388+05:30You are bang on the spot and quick to react. Agree...You are bang on the spot and quick to react. Agree with you Meera and I would call the judgement - the comments on premarital sex and the maintenance sum ridiculous. Well when will the courts order for virginity tests?<br /><br />This seems to be a judgement sans reason and one will have to even suspect a faulty faculty.<br /><br />Indeed sometimes Justices go berserk.anilkurup59https://www.blogger.com/profile/07961961217418715354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-90612869546737279622013-06-18T23:40:33.371+05:302013-06-18T23:40:33.371+05:30I have a few questions. What if a guy/girl had pr...I have a few questions. What if a guy/girl had premarital sex with more than one person, is he/she considered polygamist? Can the very first partner sue the guy for practicing polygamy? If so, how does she know she is the first one?<br /><br />To answer your title question, it is “I did”. And, that is why he/she is facing lot of problems. HaHaHa.<br />SGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05790347071764332430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-60785190215491199412013-06-18T22:44:51.229+05:302013-06-18T22:44:51.229+05:30I think this guy who wrote it in The Hindu either ...I think this guy who wrote it in The Hindu either didn't read the judgement or couldn't understand the context. The confusion between pre-marital sex and a live in relationship was more in that half-baked journalist than in the judgement. This article puts the issue in perspective: <br />http://www.firstpost.com/living/misreading-the-madras-hc-ruling-premarital-sex-is-not-marriage-883429.htmlChristopherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07301090483025279360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7269219202790509435.post-33016171430091111522013-06-18T21:25:38.237+05:302013-06-18T21:25:38.237+05:30Well said, Meera. Again I would like to reiterate ...Well said, Meera. Again I would like to reiterate the Courts have no say in what is right or wrong when it comes to one's sexual inclination. Live in relationships can be a real pain if the fling is just for sex. So long as the relationship matters to both the parties, marriages mean nothing as you say:)Cloud Ninehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02382499546129406231noreply@blogger.com